This performance was held at Millenium Point at the ThinkTank Theatre. The
performance involved architects from the workshop and a couple more
volunteers, and involved a regression in which the subjects were asked to
model visualized structures from the primary repertoire (unconscious) in
luminous play-dough. Then the subjects were asked to trace a structure from
the future, what I call "antemnesia" or anticipatory memory. The structure
was tracked in 3D, generating elevations and a plan in realtime, turning
gesture into isometric form.
Feedback:
The week we spent there was very intense and it was ambitious to say the
least to try to do so much in such little time. However I was very pleased
with the results and all the help and support that everyone from Fierce gave
us. Coming back a second time around, there seemed to be a feeling of trust
and camaraderie between us that felt good and gratifying. It seems that so
many projects and endeavors are throw-away in this fast-paced world, so it
was all the more special to feel your continued support of the project a year
later. This year the stakes were a little higher as we were working with
professional architects and there was the Riba involvement...I would like to
think that we helped create a bridge between Fierce and Riba and the future
developments of Birmingham.
As far as our impact on the architects is concerned, I also hope they enjoyed
the experience, and although there may have been some skepticism, I think
that the process may have helped to get some of these architects in touch
with their inner selves, and at the very least generated a debate as to the
source of architectural creativity. It may be useful to try to get a little
feedback from them, if you have not done so already (please forward me any
comments). Negative criticism is as useful to us as positive feedback. It is
always a surprise to see architects, who are quite a guarded species open
up, if only a little...
The results that came out of the workshop will be folded back into the
project, and it was quite interesting to see some repeats of what has
emerged over past workshops...Larry's imagined space for instance was
extremely similar to one of the spaces that we built a model of last year at
the UCE ...it was a concave space with bubble-like structures embedded into
its interior wall.
Unfortunately Larry who responded very well in the workshop, came across a
mental block in the performance probably due to some childhood trauma.
The performance I think went well, and hopefully transmitted the idea behind
Second 2kin to the general public...it was nice to hear the subjects talk about
their inner experiences. There was an obvious technical glitch which was
unfortunate, and perhaps it was too much to expect to set up all the
computers in 2 hours....in an ideal world it would have been good to get in
the day before. Luckily Leon gave us his invaluable support and I think the
performance worked anyway...
More information:
Second 2kin:
Building from the space of mind
2002-2004
Project by Marcos Lutyens and Tania Lopez Winkler
The structure of mind as mirrored by architectural spaces.
"Some neurons in the brain do explicitly encode location. "Place cells"
in the rodent hippocampus fire maximally when the animal is
physically within a particular region in its environment (for instance,
between the water-cooler and the door). Outside this restricted area,
the cell is silent."
"On the order of 100 place cells suffice to encode a 1 x 1 meter region
with a spatial resolution of a few centimeters (Zhang et al., 1998;
Brown et al., 1998)
The quest for consciousness
Kristof Koch
(Place cells were first described by O´Keefe and Nadel (1978), and in
humans: Ekstrom et al. (2003)).
Introduction Second 2kin
At the beginning of the 20th century, modernists aimed to change
society through architecture. At the end of the same century,
architects such as Piano, Koolhaas, etc, claimed to change the "self"
through architecture. Second Skin aims to change "architecture"
through the self, leaving designers´ ambition and arrogance aside. By
studying the "always already there" space within all of us we were
looking to open up new possibilities of design. But during the
development of the project, we realized that we are just re-opening
them, since the outcome indicates that civilization has dragged these
possibilities apart from the primary conception of dwelling. Second
2kin uses the idea of origin as its source for originality.
Second 2kin is an innovative exploration of design that is derived from
the most basic functions and processes of consciousness, the
unconscious. It is a project that explores the structure of mind and its
emotions as mirrores in architectural spaces.
Urbanization and architectural strategies usually follow a vector from
macro to micro, from general to specific, from prescribed and
mandatory to subjective and personal. Second Skin turns this
trajectory around, seeking a process of emergent design. Second Skin
starts by examining patterns, qualia and structures seated within the
unconscious that relate to conception of shelter and dwelling. Following
Jung's ideas on unconscious archetypes and Kant's investigation of
schematas, we flesh out what could be termed intratypes. Intratypes
may be defined as recurring dynamic patterns of our unconscious
interactions and mental programs that give coherence and structure to
our experience, and manifest as conscious thought, intelligence and
actions.
These modules of mental processing are coaxed out through an
application of a hypnotic induction technique and projected into the
terrain of architecture. Following suggestions of amnesia and agnosia
which disengage the subjects from conscious tendencies to apply
filtered external conceptions to their thought processes, such as
contamination from media or indirect peer pressure, they are asked to
extend their consciousness to envelop a Second Skin. The Second Skin
is an architectural space that corresponds to an enlarged self, that
comprises aspects of memory, brain function and deeply rooted
notions of protection and shelter. Essentially, Second Skin uses the
processes of mind as a model for architectural approaches and at the
same time uses architecture as a metaphor for housing the collective
space of mind.
The development of the project has involved architecture students and
professionals from around the globe to form the basis for a new
emergent approach to architecture, an architecture that is tied to the
unconscious rather than predetermined codes, textbooks, fashion and
architects´ dictatorial spaces. We seek to point the way to a "new"
design that grows from and fits the most fundamental needs and
desires of the self and group. Through Second 2kin, we search for
architectural spaces that reverberate within the self, allowing for an
identification of the person with his/her dwelling space.
The project began in June of 2001 as an experimental project with
some students from the Architectural Association in London, and has
extended to workshops at the Academy of Art, Gdansk, Poland, as well
as at the International Festival of Media in Architecture "Beyond
Media", Florence, Italy in May 2002,and the Faculty of Architecture at
San Luis Obispo, CA. Between January and June 2002 students at the
Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores the Monterrey, at the
faculty of Queretaro, Mexico collaborated in depth both in architecture
and programming to develop Second Skin into a dynamic model of
emergent architecture. The most recent workshop, performance and
exhibit was with the Fierce! Festival and RIBA in Birmingham, UK 2004
Induction
Ultimately our aim is to develop a seamless interface between the
individual´s mind and surroundings that will enable our environment to
better fit within us and us within our environment.
When investigating the possibility of purely mind-driven design -
uncontaminated by media and external influences - the phenomenon
of memory without awareness and instances or cases in which a
mental disassociation takes place are key in pursuing the idea of
mental though that is independent of external influences, or is only
dependent on unexpected or curiously tangential ways. The process
used for this enquiry is hypnosis, as the use of this method allows us to
communicate directly with the unconscious. Hypnosis allows the
extraction of deeply rooted conceptions or schemas that are closely
tied to the emotional states and the body´s extended intelligence
through the central nervous system. It could be said that the
unconscious part of the self is like a pattern: when extracted as an
object - in this case a "house" - is a reflection of the person.
The process itself is unhindered by the usual social considerations such
as practicality, conformity or desire, or considerations towards the self,
such as the need for original thought to satisfy hunger, procreation or
even milder compulsions. By suspending these constraints, even for a
moment, we can get a glimpse of the mind itself at work. By doing
this, we aim to gain a certain insight into our relationship with the
world around us, in terms of which part of consciousness is generated
by rule, by habit, by constraint and which part corresponds to the mind
itself, as a mirror to its own workings.
Digitization
Some of the houses obtained during the volunteers´ inductions might
resemble physical structures of the mind as well as its processes. This
evokes the alchemist conception shared in several ancient cultures of
the "as well low as high" (Tabula Smaragdina) meaning the
correspondence between the micro and the macro, the interior and the
exterior, the self and the collective.
To illustrate this, some houses appear to mirror the two cerebral
hemispheres through form and symmetry, as in the case of Cordula
Weisser who visualized an organically shaped double helix. The nested
network of branching structures appears several times in different
volunteers - like Roman Priewsly- similar in effect to an electron
microscope analysis of the microtubules that make up the structure of
the brain.
The view through a certain window opening with a constantly changing
exterior landscape, as visualized by Michael Hensel, echoes the visual
pathway from the optic nerve to the lateral geniculate nucleus to the
primary visual cortex. Creativity is only the bridge between the
reflection of the micro to the macro.
Following the interview, the information about the inner dwelling is
translated as accurately as possible into a digital model. The model is
built in 10 different "layers," each layer corresponding to a separate
aspect of the structure: such as ceiling/roof, walls, floor, openings,
interior objects, exterior objects.
Program
In order to recognize the patterns that emerge from the mind, we have
developed a program that sorts the data extracted from hundreds of
hypnosis sessions into its essential characteristics. This program is
known as a "fitness function" or "genetic algorithm," and its roots may
be traced as far back as 1958, to Oliver Selfridge´s presentation at the
National Physics Laboratory of "Pandemonium: a paradigm for
Learning," in which he outlined the basis for pattern-recognition
software.
Although this kind of software has been applied to everything from
palm-pilots to more exotic mathematical and spatial investigations
such as those undertaken by Marcos Novak over the past dozen years,
its application to changing our understanding of consciousness ha only
just begun.
After analyzing the results, we realized the need to filter the common
traits in several houses we have processed, having some kind of sense
of the collection of visualized structure. Perhaps the idea of a
"collective-house" or deeply embedded, shared generic programming
may seem a little far-fetched, we have nevertheless been interested in
filtering the visual data we have extracted into a kind of coherent
pattern that allows for quirks and variations and yet reflects collective
tendencies.
Furthermore, our intention has not been to end up with a single
utopian conclusion, but to offer up a variety of "heterotopias," each
version offering a temporary conclusion. For this end, we have
constructed a "genetic algorithm" program that "mates" the formal
architectural structures visualized by each volunteer and "breeds" the
forms through several generations.
The use of this fitness-function program, along with the use of
hypnosis, allows us to avoid value judgements, which may colour our
results and findings, and at the same time enables us to find
correlations and common thinking patterns between a wide range of
[participants.
The algorithm sorts the architectural forms for traits to determine the
final form. From this form, condensed spatial information can be
extracted and included in the design of architectural spaces.
Article:
The Guardian
Jonathan Glancey
Wednesday June 23, 2004
Blobs, spirals, vortexes, fractal geometry... you might be forgiven for thinking
that the design of all too many wacky new buildings is conducted by
architects in a trance-like state. But that is exactly what Marcus Lutyens, a
Los Angeles-based artist and hypnotherapist, has been striving to induce
over the past few weeks.
With his beady blue eyes and mellifluous voice, the great-nephew of Edwin
Lutyens, one of England's greatest architects, has been sending those
working on the designs for Eastside, Birmingham's "new cultural and creative
quarter", into deep trances. Once there, he has asked them to explore primal
notions of shelter and dwelling and, while still hypnotised, draw them -
unhindered by waking considerations of costs, timetables and the need to
keep clients sweet. The results are on display from today until July 16 at
Birmingham's Millennium Point.
Some of the spontaneous pencil drawings by the Brummie architects have
been run through computer programs, while others have been re-created in
3-D. If several suggest tents or evoke other elemental structures, it should
come as no surprise. Most of us share images and sensations of ideal forms
of shelter, but these are rarely the designs architects work up during the
waking day.
"Under the skin, and under hypnosis," says Lutyens, "architects will come up
with much less rigid designs than they feel they have to make. I've not seen
many examples of Modern Movement design; it's usually something far more
organic, sometimes as if the spirit of Gaudì were hovering over their
shoulders."
Some of the drawings, however, look a little knowing and polished. Either
some architects were only pretending to be cast under Lutyens's spell, or the
subconscious world of Eastside architects is rigorously scientific, and not
trance-like at all.
Second2kin Fierce Festival 2004.rtf
1 de 1
7 de 7